Public Safety - What Barry Goode and I Stand For

Voters have to sift through the verbiage to find candidates they want to support.  Here is what Barry and I stand for on public safety so you can compare us to our opponents:

Plainfield residents need to feel safe and be safe in their homes, neighborhoods and downtown.  We back that up with specific pledges:

• as Council members, we will make sure that there are sufficient funds for surveillance cameras to be working in our downtown and around crime hot spots.  After many years of talk, its about time we make this happen.
• as Alcoholic Beverage Control commissioners, we will strictly enforce the rules at bars with a lot of criminal activity.  Right now some of these bars are using our police to respond to these problems.  Our police are serving as their security force and the taxpayers are picking up the bill.  Going forward, these bars will pay the consequences of the problems they cause.  If they can't, we will shut them down.  Our residents will have top priority for police respond to calls for help.
• we will redirect the huge overtime pay budget to hire new officers so we can come back to the full compliment of officers we need.  Crime fighting takes precedence over building pensions.
• we will give our full support to the Mayor and Police Director as they refocus our police resources for the benefit of our residents.  The City Council, as it is today, is not supportive and actually makes it more difficult for city hall to make the positive changes Plainfield needs.

Support Barry Goode and me in Column C in the Democratic primary on June 2.  I challenge our opponents to say what they will do for Plainfield.  Will they do more than criticize and complain?  Do they have specific plans to help Plainfield other than merely saying they are for Plainfield? 

The Democratic Team for Plainfield's Future is in Column C in the June 2 Primary Election

Click on photo to enlarge

 

It's time for a change.

It's election season in Plainfield.  How do we know?  Jerry Green sent out a negative piece in the mail.  There is very little true in this campaign piece except:  Mapp and his County Committee team on COLUMN C want to take over the Democratic Party. 

We do want to take leadership of the Plainfield Democratic Committee from Jerry Green.  Mr Green has led the party for most of the last 20 years.  In 2015, true to form, he decided who will get the party line in the June 2 primary.  Problem is - he didn't  consult his 68 committee members, all of who were elected by registered Plainfield Democrats.  He has run the local Democratic Party in most undemocratic fashion.  Even worse, he frequently selects people to run for local office who are not prepared for the responsibility of representing the people.
 

Follow the messaging from the two Democratic Party groups.  One is about a vision, about the potential for Plainfield and what we can do about it.  The other is negative messaging.  After 20 years running the Plainfield Democratic Party, we would hope that Jerry Green has something positive to say, something to show Plainfield about his accomplishments.

Democratic voters have a real choice on June 2.  Column C is for progress, for the people.  Column A is to help Jerry stay in power.    Vote for me, Barry Goode and our slate of Democratic Committee members.  We have no special interests other than the people of Plainfield.

Thank you Ed Santiago, Plainfield Police Chief

Chief Santiago is retiring from the force.  He received a proclamation and a standing ovation from those in attendance at the last Council meeting.  It was well deserved.  He served Plainfield well for many years as a dedicated, trustworthy and progressive public servant.

He made some remarks, gracious and unselfish as always, including compliments to current Police Director Carl Riley and retired Courier News reporter Bernice Paglia.

Ed - your presence on the police force will be missed.  And I know I am speaking for many thousands of residents over the year in saying that you made life better in Plainfield in countless ways.

What Good Government Should Look Like

There are two sides to the Plainfield Earned Sick Leave ordinance.  Both sides have expressed their positions at the March and April City Council meetings with passion.  There is one more meeting in April at which the Council could approve the ordinance on second reading, which is the final step for an ordinance.  The Council has options.  We could approve it as is or we could approve with amendments.  A third choice is to vote it down but no-one on Council has taken that position and I do not believe anyone will switch in this direction.  In my opinion, the best outcome is a compromise through amendments.

 Bridget Rivers suggested that there is still one week before the next April Council meeting for the two sides to come together for compromise.

After last Mondays Council meeting it was not clear to me that someone agreed to take the lead to convene a session between the two sides. So I made some phone calls, encouraging stakeholders to have one more working session towards a compromise ordinance.  I suggested that 2 or 3 people represent each side and that, given Plainfield's unique job market and business environment, each side include local people, not just outsiders.

City Council members would be the natural and logical conveners of such a meeting (I was not volunteering because, in the limited time before Mondays Council meeting, my schedule makes it difficult for me to be one of them).

I hope this meeting takes place and a compromise is brought back to the April 13 Council meeting.  If so, I will be very receptive to it. If not, I will propose amendments to create a balanced ordinance that works for Plainfield.

A working session is also an opportunity for relationship building within the business community and between them and local government.  This is sorely needed.  The Plainfield Chamber of Commerce, the Special Improvement District and the Plainwood Square Merchants do not always work well together.  It appears that a new group, the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, may be entering the Plainfield business scene.  And the relationship between the business community and the Council and administration could stand improvement.  This legislation is an opportunity to work together, a step beyond complaining about lack of cooperation.

One point needs to be clear. From the beginning, this ordinance was in the hands of the City Council.  Councilwoman Rebecca Williams was the initiator and sponsor of this legislation.  The Mayor and administration have recommended two amendments but have no vote on the subject.  Will the Council step up and take legislative leadership?

Demolition on North Avenue

As I was leaving the Plainfield Donut Shop Saturday morning, I noticed fire trucks everywhere.  When I saw North Avenue blocked off between Park and Gavett Place, I stopped to observe the commotion on North Ave. 

Directors Riley and Watson were on hand to oversee the demotion.  It was halted when the building next door was damaged by falling debris. The restaurant occupying that space had no people instead.  That is good because the damage was substantial. 

I hope the restaurant owners have business interruption insurance because they will be out of commission for a while.  They have suffered unfortunate consequences through no fault of their own.  The city needs to do everything possible to help them turn this problem into a business opportunity.

The building to be demolished is now completely taken down.  Other bloggers have covered this situation well.  What I have to add is a planning perspective.  These properties are 1/2 block from the train station.  Renovations have taken place across the street and in the next block.  This block has seen no development or renovation activity because of the eyesore/safety hazard that is now demolished.  I called for its demolition 2 years ago but heard no response from city hall aside from the information that the property owner was "missing" for many years.  This demolition opens up a redevelopment opportunity that our downtown needs very much. 

The building next door may have to be replaced as well, depending on what the engineers have to say.  It is an one story building in a zone allowing at least 4 stories (maybe 5, not more than 6).  This property owner also may have a redevelopment opportunity. 

The interested parties - property owners, restaurant owner, current developers with projects near the train station, the city, other local business owners - should be talking about the potential this demolition has created.  A mixed use, transit oriented project belongs on this block.  One with architectural features respecting the North Ave. Historic District.  A project that could benefit all interested parties and Plainfield overall.

NJ.com Headline Misleading and Unfair to Eric Jackson

Shame on you NJ.com or Star-Ledger editor who wrote the headline on the Plainfield fraud investigation.  Yes, you have to grab the attention of the public in a competitive news media market.  But you still have a responsibility when you write attention grabbing headlines not to make unfair implications about a persons behavior and ultimately his/her reputation. 

I have no problem with the facts in the story itself and I want to add my perspective on Eric Jackson and the climate in city hall during the time he served Plainfield as head of the Department of Public Works and Urban Development.

First of all, I was grateful to be able to work with Mr Jackson in Plainfield.  I shared the widely held view of him as a man of integrity and effectiveness.  In fact, he stood out in the Sharon Robinson-Briggs cabinet, rising about the political divisions, dedicated to getting his job done well and raising the bar for performance in his department.

As Bernice Paglia stated in her blog, Eric Jackson oversaw many divisions.  Some had been stuck using outdated tools and methods for many years.  That is changing under Mayor Mapp but Jackson started the ball rolling in the right direction.  Recreation in particular showed a lack of commitment to accountability and appeared to underperform with the approval and protection of Mayor Robinson-Briggs.  In spite of this difficult situation, Mr. Jackson took steps to improve the Recreation Division.

In this situation and others, Eric Jackson stood for what is right at the risk of angering the powers that be.  He passes the integrity test in my view. 

What is happening now at city hall is an audit of transactions in the Department of Public Works and Urban Development.  I cannot say more except to say that originally a majority of the City Council was opposed and now have approved funds for this audit.  We have to wait for the auditors report.  The firm hired is independent and from outside the city.  They will not risk their reputation to give us anything but an objective finding of facts.  I  believe that when we have more facts, the positive views of Eric Jackson throughout Plainfield will be confirmed.  Time will tell.